The Polemic On The General Line Of The International Communist Movement
Condition remarks:
Book: Good
Jacket: Wear and tear
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
A landmark work of Marxist-Leninist political theory, The Polemic on the General Line of the International Communist Movement presents the ideological arguments at the heart of the Sino-Soviet Split of the early 1960s, compiled from a series of authoritative documents issued by the Communist Party of China. The text chronicles the sharp theoretical and political dispute between the Chinese and Soviet communist parties, centering on questions of peaceful coexistence, revisionism, and the correct revolutionary path for the global communist movement. Written with the unflinching conviction of party doctrine, it argues forcefully that the Soviet leadership under Khrushchev had betrayed the principles of Marxism-Leninism and led the international movement toward ideological compromise. Each document builds upon the last, constructing a systematic and polemical case against what the Chinese party characterized as modern revisionism. This collection remains an essential primary source for scholars of Cold War history, communist theory, and the fracturing of the twentieth-century socialist world order.
Original: $20.31
-65%$20.31
$7.11Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
Condition remarks:
Book: Good
Jacket: Wear and tear
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
A landmark work of Marxist-Leninist political theory, The Polemic on the General Line of the International Communist Movement presents the ideological arguments at the heart of the Sino-Soviet Split of the early 1960s, compiled from a series of authoritative documents issued by the Communist Party of China. The text chronicles the sharp theoretical and political dispute between the Chinese and Soviet communist parties, centering on questions of peaceful coexistence, revisionism, and the correct revolutionary path for the global communist movement. Written with the unflinching conviction of party doctrine, it argues forcefully that the Soviet leadership under Khrushchev had betrayed the principles of Marxism-Leninism and led the international movement toward ideological compromise. Each document builds upon the last, constructing a systematic and polemical case against what the Chinese party characterized as modern revisionism. This collection remains an essential primary source for scholars of Cold War history, communist theory, and the fracturing of the twentieth-century socialist world order.
